North Star Framework

All posts

Blog

What makes a good North Star

·Martin Börlin

#north-star-metric#product-strategy#alignment

Many companies have something they call a North Star.

A metric that is meant to guide decisions, create alignment, and show whether they are moving in the right direction.

But if you look closer, it often turns out to be something else.

A KPI.

A target.

Or a proxy for internal performance.

And that distinction matters more than it seems.

A North Star is not a business goal

"Increase revenue by 20%."

"Launch more features."

"Grow market share."

These are all important outcomes.

But they are not a North Star.

A North Star is a measure of customer success.

Because in a healthy product company, your success is a consequence of your customers succeeding.

That is the core idea.

The real test: who is it about?

A simple way to evaluate your North Star is to ask:

Is it about us? Or is it about the customer?

"Number of features shipped" reflects internal activity.

"Number of users who successfully achieve their goal using our product" reflects delivered value.

Only one of these helps teams make better decisions over time.

Where things typically go wrong

There are a few recurring patterns:

  • The metric captures activity instead of value
  • It shifts every quarter and never stabilizes
  • It sounds inspiring, but cannot be measured
  • It becomes so complex that few people can explain it

In those situations, the North Star gradually loses its role as a guiding concept.

Teams stop referring to it.

Decisions are made based on other signals.

The connection between strategy and everyday work weakens.

What a good North Star actually does

A strong North Star has four characteristics:

Customer-centric
It measures the value your customers actually get.

Leading
It indicates future growth, not just past results.

Durable
It remains relevant over time, even as the product evolves.

Understandable
People across the organization can explain it without translation.

If it lacks any of these, it becomes difficult to use in practice.

Start with value, not the metric

A common mistake is to jump straight to the number.

A better starting point is the customer:

What needs to be true for our customers to succeed?

From there, identify the behavior that shows that success.

That behavior is what you measure.

For example:

  • In SaaS: users publishing or completing meaningful actions
  • In marketplaces: successful transactions
  • In platforms: successful deployments

Not everything you deliver has value on its own.

But it should contribute to something that does.

The arrow test

A useful test is this:

If we maximize this metric, will we also reach our business goals over time?

If the answer is unclear, the metric is likely not a good North Star.

There needs to be a clear connection:

Customer success → Company success

Without that, optimization becomes disconnected from long-term outcomes.

Why this matters more than it seems

Defining a North Star is not about wording.

It is about clarity.

When the direction is clear:

  • prioritization becomes more grounded
  • trade-offs become easier to reason about
  • alignment emerges without constant coordination

Teams can see how their work contributes to something larger.

Without that clarity, speed tends to amplify confusion rather than progress.

A North Star only works if it is used

Even a well-defined North Star has little impact if it stays in a slide deck.

It needs to be visible and part of everyday conversations.

It should show up in planning, in prioritization, and in simple questions like:

"How does this move our North Star?"

That question alone can replace a surprising amount of alignment overhead.

Final thought

A North Star is not just a metric.

It is a way of making direction tangible.

When it works, it stops being part of a strategy document and becomes part of how the organization thinks and makes decisions.